MBA Alumni | MBA Students | MBA Aspirants | MBA Forums
--- MBA Home ---

CoolAvenues.com

Subscribe
to
MyJobAlerts

on the web  
 

Home     |     MBA Jobs     |     Knowledge Zone      |     Seminars      |     Placement Report      |     Admission Alert       |     Café     |     Search

"Why Change Efforts Often Fail" by Peter Frans

Knowledge Zone - Human Resource

 Home

 Knowledge Zone Home

 General Management

 Finance

 Marketing

 Human Resource

 System

 Operations

 Netpreneurship

 Knowledge Seminar

 MBA Forums
 Search
 Join e-Communities
 Be a CoolAssociate
 Give Suggestions

 Company Search
 
 

Subscribe:
Seminar & MDP Alert
   To keep yourself updated with the latest Seminars & MDP happenings in the country, join Knowledge Seminar& MDP mailing lists.


Latest Management Discussion on CoolAvenues Forums



Why Change Efforts Often Fail

- by Peter Frans *

By any objective measure the amount of significant, often traumatic, changes in organizations has grown tremendously over the past decade. Powerful "macro" forces are at work and these forces may grow even stronger over the next few decades. As a results more and more organizations will be pushed to increase efficiency, improve the quality of products & services, locate new opportunities for growth, and increase productivity.

To-date, major change efforts have helped some Indonesian organizations adapt significantly to shifting conditions, have improved the competitive standing of others and have positioned a few for a far better future. But in too many cases the improvements have been disappointing and the damage has been appalling, with wasted resources and burnout, scared, or frustrated employees.

To some degree, the downside of change is inevitable. Whenever people are forced to adjust to shifting conditions, pain is ever present. But the significant amount of waste and agony we have witnessed in the past decade is avoidable. A lot of errors have been, the most common of which are: -

  • Attempting too little too late or too much too soon

  • Allowing too much complacency

  • Failing to create efficient powerful guiding coalition

  • Underestimating the vision

  • Permitting obstacles to block the new vision

  • Failing to create short-term gains

  • Declaring victory too soon

  • Neglecting to anchor changes firmly in the corporate culture

In many instances, above errors have resulted in the following consequences: -

  • New strategies are not implemented well

  • Downsizing does not get costs under control

  • Re-engineering takes too long and costs too much

  • Quality programs do not deliver the hoped-for results

  • Acquisitions don’t achieve the expected synergies

The errors and consequences are not inevitable. With awareness and the proper competencies, they can be avoided or at least greatly minimized. The key lies in understanding why organizations resist deeded change, what exactly is the multistage process that can overcome destructive inertia, and, most of all, now the leadership that is required to drive that process in a socially healthy way means more than good management.


* Contributed by: -
Peter Frans,
Managing Partner,
Trimitra Consultants.
Source: The Net


Send this E-mail this Article

 



Home
 |  MBA Jobs | Knowledge Zone | Seminar & MDP |  Placement Report |  Café |  Bazaar |  MBA Forums

Advertise with Us  |  CoolAvenues Services  |  Copyright  |  Privacy Statement  |  Cool Feedback  |  Contact Us

Site managed by Zebra Networks
© CoolAvenues logo & design template are exclusive copyright of Zebra Networks 2004-2008
© All copyrights with Zebra Networks. Part or full of the contents can not be published, copied or reproduced
in any form without the prior written exclusive permission of Zebra Networks.
Other trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.