| MBA Alumni | MBA Students | MBA Aspirants | MBA Forums | ||||||||
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
Home | MBA Jobs | Knowledge Zone | Seminars | Placement Report | Admission Alert | café | Search |
||||||||
|
Netpreneurs |
|
by Charu Mathur Internet Overview
Internet is a recent phenomenon. It is so new that most of Internet companies do not recognize the pitfalls that can accompany doing business on-line. Most of us are still learning how to navigate the Internet safely! This article is intended to alert towards legal risks while doing business on net and route to deal with them is timely legal counseling. Each Website is known to the world by a particular webname or Domain
name as it is called, which is actually combination of few numbers call
IP address that for our present information is not essential.
Every company, even those not conducting significant business on-line, should be concerned about harm it may suffer due to the on-line conduct of others. The principal examples include trademark infringement, copyright infringement, defamation, and unauthorized access torts. Trademark risk has changed in the on-line environment. In the area of trademark law legal risks have changed due to the advent of the Internet. There is no such thing as a local or regional trademark on the Internet – the global nature of the Internet means that unregistered trademarks that previously did not conflict due to geographic or industry separation now find themselves in conflict when used on-line, where every web-based advertisement is accessible in every market. In contests over desirable domain names – the phrases such as "yahoo.com" that companies use to identify their web sites – unregistered marks are at a distinct disadvantage. In short, the Internet places an increasing premium on registered trademarks, and on unique "strong" marks. It also places a premium on diligence in policing the Internet to uncover infringing uses at the earliest opportunity. Recently our own Indian courts have passed injunctions against cybersquatting against the companies which registered domain names as "tanishq.com","bisleri.com" where they had no relation to the registered real world Trademark. And very recently courts have granted Injunction in favor of"rediff.com" to prevent"radiff.com" to use domain name radiff.com on grounds of deceptively similar. The first step should be to register domain names which do not conflict with real world Trademarks. Now the trends have changed and people really don't pay to purchase the domain names, which they can get from courts. Another threat to companies is "e-Defamation". Defamation of companies
and management on-line is increasing. Companies are also finding themselves
under attack from negative web pages, which disparage their products, management,
financial condition, employment practices, or other aspects of their business.
Such pages frequently divert users from the company’s official page by
closely mirroring its domain name or using the target company’s trademark
on their own page to fool search engines into pulling up the critical page
in response to a search request designed to find the official page.
Everybody and anybody has some sort of Internet presence, ranging from developing homepages at tripod.com to paid static web page which is little more than a simple, electronic advertisement to complex web pages which allow a full range of electronic commerce activities to be performed on-line, including communication and contracting with the company’s supply chain, distribution channel, and ultimate consumers. In some ways the process of setting up a web page is easy (tripod is matter of 5 min.). Then there are Professional web page developers who take care from the entire process from initial concept to final design. In many cases the developer will host the page on its server, handle updates, and arrange for electronic payment and encryption systems. However, such vendors frequently offer standard web page development and hosting agreements, which contain hidden time bombs that can result in substantial legal difficulties down the road. Here again culprit is IPR-Intellectual Property Right. The development agreements should be clear about ownership of intellectual property. The parties may not share the same assumptions as to who will own the intangible property rights in the developed product, including copyright, trademark, patent, and publicity rights. The 'work for Hire' doctrine under copyright law may not be applicable, resulting in the developer retaining full ownership of the copyrights to the work it creates for the other party. A development contract should specify who owns the content that goes into the web page, otherwise conflicts may erupt if the company decides to revise the page or move it to a new host. Performance specifications and warranties are important features of
any development contract. The contract also should specify procedures for
acceptance and testing of the finished page. Web hosting agreements also
raise concerns. Nobody likes a web site that is down, slow, or otherwise
unreliable. A web hosting agreement should specify the level of service
the company is paying for. A Company should consider being able to terminate
the agreement for failure to maintain the contracted-for service levels.
It’s not sufficient merely to have a web site; rather, surfers expect
updated information. For this reason, the web host should provide specified
tools to enable remote updating through file transfer from the company.
Some web hosts will provide updating services. Other companies may opt
to have their initial developer provide updates. In any event, a company
ought to consider who will provide the updates, and how they will be incorporated
into the web site. The hosting agreement should also deal with responsibility
for security. Sophisticated software and the use of "cookies" can provide
important information about visitors to the site and their use of the site.
Visitors may also be asked to provide personal information through registration
or in connection with transactions. Such information can be used to further
modify a site to better serve its users. Often a company will want to control
any information obtained through its web site, however, this information
may also be valuable to the hosting service. The hosting agreement should
state which party has what rights to information obtained from users.
The Internet is an ideal environment for contracting, as it is essentially
instantaneous and interactive. Contracting on-line can be structured to
eliminate ambiguities that can result from the exchange of paper documents
in the real world. The so-called "battle of the forms" often results when
businesses contract with one another by exchange of pre-printed forms.
While those forms will probably agree on basic terms like price, quantity,
delivery and the like, they may contain varying boilerplate terms regarding
arbitration clauses, forum selection, limitations of warranties, opportunity
for cure, and the like. Internet contracting can be set up with only one
form – the offeror’s – with acceptance limited to the offered terms. Collateral
terms offered in free text can be avoided by providing that acceptance
can be indicated in only one manner – by "clicking" or typing "I accept"
in a given box. Similarly, the instantaneous nature of the Internet avoids
disputes over the timing of offer and acceptance.
The need to keep legal disclaimers in their place. Business people do not want their web page cluttered up with legal disclaimers and boilerplate provisions Digital signature legislation.
The global nature of cyberspace is its strength but can also pose dangers.
A company may only want to reach a small, select audience with its message,
but once the company’s web page is posted it will necessarily reach the
entire world. This can cause problems when the company’s message is illegal
in certain jurisdictions, or when communicated to certain audiences such
as minors. Industries traditionally regulated on a geographical basis,
such as insurance and securities, need to consider how to avoid making
offers or other communications on-line which are unlawful in certain jurisdictions
because they have not been pre-approved or filed, or because the entity
making the offer or communication is not registered or licensed there.
Personal jurisdiction may depend on the interactivity of a web site.
In addition, doing business on-line, or even just advertising on a web
page, may subject an entity to suit in distant jurisdictions. Parties entering
into contracts over the Internet can anticipate this risk and attempt to
contract around it with choice of law, choice of forum, or arbitration
clauses. But some torts, like defamation or trademark infringement, do
not require any transaction to take place to be actionable. The law in
this area remains unsettled and continues to evolve. If any trend can be
discerned it is that interactive web sites, which invite the viewer to
register, provide data or information, and generally enter into an on-line
relationship with the web page sponsor, are more likely to support assertion
of jurisdiction over a distant web page sponsor than a mere static web
page.
Privacy is another area of great concern. There are many websites, Interactive and non-interactive, which collects Data and pass on to various companies for a price. Sometimes data is asked directly where there is a clause that it will be passed to group companies, and sometimes discreetly by cookies etc, or even on Interactive websites and passed to unscrupulous websites end result is harassment to user. Internet and e-mail policies and the workplace
Record keeping and retention
Conclusion
by: Charu Mathur. Charu is a law student at Government Law College,
Bangalore.
References:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertise with Us | CoolAvenues Services | Copyright | Privacy Statement | Cool Feedback | Contact Us
Site managed by Zebra Networks |