Finance @ Knowledge Zone



"CRISIL-rated NBFCs Demonstrate a Strengthening Business Model"

Previous

Part - V

Table 2
Banks and NBFCs’ all-inclusive funding costs


Banks Earlier* Present**
Level of savings deposits (A) 20% 25%
Level of current deposits (B) 15% 10%
Level of term deposits (C) 65% 65%
Total deposits (D=A+B+C) 100% 100%
Cost of savings deposits (E) 4.5% 3.0%
Cost of term deposits (F) 9.70% 5.25%
Interest cost (G=A*E + C*F) 7.21% 4.16%
Operating cost*** (H) 3.25% 2.50%
Negative carry# (I) 0.47% 0.34%
All-inclusive cost (J=G+H+I) 10.93% 7.00%
Highly rated NBFCs## Earlier Present
Yield on 3-year G-Sec (K) 10.00% 4.70%
Spread over 3-year G-Sec (L) 2.00% 1.20%
Cost of funds (M=K+L) 12.50% 5.90%
Operating cost (N) 2.50% 2.09%
All-inclusive cost (O=M+30%*N)### 12.75% 6.53%
NBFC disadvantage (P=O-J) 1.82% -0.48%

CRISIL-rated NBFCs’ improve core profitability indicators

CRISIL-rated NBFCs have exhibited a sharp improvement in their core profitability between FY2000-01 and FY2000- 03$. Their core profitability, as measured by the net profitability margin (NPM)$$, rose from 0.77 per cent in FY2000-01 to 1.90 per cent in FY2002-03, mainly because of higher interest spreads given the relatively higher decline in interest costs vis-à-vis the fall in business yields in this period. The marginal increase in their fee income and strict overhead cost controls, especially by NBFCs engaged in vehicle financing, have also helped to enhance their profitability.

Asset quality maintained despite rising business volumes

The larger CRISIL-rated NBFCs have continued to grow their business volumes in spite of stiff competition from banks. But their growth rates have varied as most of them have not been able to keep pace with banks in the retail businesses of car, commercial vehicle and two-wheeler financing and personal loans. As a result, banks have made higher incremental disbursements.

Next

* CRISIL’s estimates of levels for 1999-2000 ** CRISIL’s estimates of existing levels *** CRISIL’s estimates
# Computed as follows: {(Interest cost of deposits + 70% of operating expenses)-Yield on regulatory investments)*Proportion of regulatory investments}. SLR and CRR assumed to be = 25% and 9.5% respectively in the earlier scenario and 25% and 4.5% respectively in the current scenario.
## All numericals are based on CRISIL estimates.
### Assuming that 30% of operating costs can be considered as incurred in raising resources on an aggregate basis for such NBFCs
$ Refer to CRISIL’s opinion piece: “Core Profitability of CRISIL rated
NBFCs shows sharp growth”
$$ Net Profitability Margin = Interest spread – Overheads + Core Fee Income


Source: CRISIL