Previous
Part - II
This has broad-based the NBFCs’ resources profile with the
proportion of on-balance sheet funding (excluding
securitization) raised by NBFCs from the market, in the form
of non-convertible debentures and commercial paper,
increasing from 39 per cent to 47 per cent (from FY1999-
00 to FY2002-03) (see Exhibit 1). Funding from banks and
other sources has remained steady at around 45 per cent
of total funds borrowed.
In terms of lending rates too, most banks now lend to highly
rated NBFCs at market-related rates as compared to the
premium that they charged historically. Earlier, bank funds
were largely available at prime lending rate (PLR)-linked
rates. The NBFCs’ dependence on relatively high-cost fixed
deposits has also diminished with the proportion of such
borrowings dropping from 16 per cent to 8 per cent (from
FY1999-00 to FY2002-03).
Exhibit 1
Changing Resource Profile of NBFCs*
Securitization has also emerged as an important and
attractive funding source for NBFCs, especially since it offers
other benefits like superior credit rating levels, better
exposure and asset liability maturity management
opportunities and capital adequacy benefits. The NBFCs’
increasing affinity to securitization is exemplified by the
sharp growth in CRISIL-rated securitization transactions
by NBFCs from an insignificant Rs.2.09 billion in FY2000-
01 to Rs.20.50 billion in FY2002-03. This amounts to 9
per cent of the total borrowed funds of CRISIL-rated NBFCs
as at March 31, 2003 as compared to 1 per cent as at
March 31, 2001.
Next
* Securitization is considered as an off-balance sheet funding source. It is
being indicated here as a proportion of on-balance sheet borrowing for
FY2002-03 and FY2000-01 (instead of FY1999-00) to facilitate
comparison
Source: CRISIL
|