MBA Alumni | MBA Students | MBA Aspirants | MBA Forums
--- MBA Home ---

CoolAvenues.com

offers
Advertising
Services

on the web  
 

Home     |    MBA Jobs      |     Knowledge Zone      |     Seminars      |     Placement Report      |     Admission Alert       |     café     |     Search

Finance Management | "Uncovering Price-Earnings Ratio & PEG (Price Earnings to Growth) Ratio"

Finance @ Knowledge Zone

 Home

 Knowledge Zone Home

 General Management

 Finance

 Marketing

 Human Resource

 System

 Operations

 Knowledge Seminar

 MBA Forums
 Search
 Join e-Communities
 Be a CoolAssociate
 Give Suggestions

 Company Search
 
 

Subscribe:
Seminar & MDP Alert
   To keep yourself updated with the latest Seminars & MDP happenings in the country, join Knowledge Seminar& MDP mailing lists.


Latest Management Discussion on CoolAvenues Forums



Uncovering Price-Earnings Ratio & PEG (Price Earnings to Growth) Ratio

- by Varun Dawar *

Previous

Page - 3

Substantial evidence supports the view that the market takes a sophisticated approach to assessing accounting earnings. This evidence can be grouped into 3 classes: -

  • Evidence that accounting earnings are not very well correlated with share prices

  • Evidence that earnings window-dressing doesn't improve share prices

  • Evidence that the market evaluates management decisions based on their expected long-term cash flow impact, and not on their short-term earnings impact

    Empirical Proof of Low Correlation Between Accounting Earnings and Share Prices

    According to the accounting model, a strong correlation should exist between EPS growth and shareholder returns. However, a study shows that there is hardly any correlation with Pearson's Coefficient being as low as 0.17.

    The study included the companies under BSE-100 Index. Average EPS growth was calculated by considering the data for the past 4 years (2000-2004). When similar study was conducted in US capital markets, the Pearson's Coefficient was 0.088.

    In many ways, the venerable P/E ratio is a blunt instrument. All it tells you is that one stock is selling for 10 times its earnings per share, and another is selling for 30 times earnings. And yet the two companies could be in completely different industries, and could also be at completely different stages of development. Should they be valued in the same way? Most analysts would argue that they shouldn't.

    Next


    * Contributed by: -
    Varun Dawar,
    PGDBM, Batch 2004-06,
    Institute of Management Technology (IMT), Ghaziabad.


    Post Your Comments       |       E-mail to Friend       |       Want to Contribute

  • Send this E-mail this Article

     

    MBA Jobs
    MBA Preparation
    B-Schools
    MBA Forums
    About CoolAvenues
    Senior Mgmt Jobs CAT / MAT/ CET Dean talk CAT Preparation Post a Job
    Finance Jobs Admission Alert B-School Profile Executive MBA Advertise with Us
    Marketing Jobs MBA Insider B-School Diary Career Help Contact us
    HR MBA Jobs MBA Admission Process Summer GMAT Privacy
    Operations MBA Jobs English Preparation MBA News Companies Copyrights
    IT MBA Jobs MBA Abroad MBA Events B-Schools About CoolAenues
    Consulting MBA Jobs CAT / MAT / CET test papers MBA Placements Summer Guidance
    Resume Design Tips MBA in India Summers Guide Classifieds

    © All Copyrights exclusive with Zebra Networks
    Part or full of the contents can not be published, copied or reproduced
    in any form without the prior written exclusive permission of Zebra Networks. Pls refer to CoolAvenues Copyright section.